flag SevierDemocrats.com
S  E  V  I  E  R    C  O  U  N  T  Y  ,    T  E  N  N  E  S  S  E  E
line
FREEDOM & JUSTICE
Bob Moore
Thursday, June 16, 2005

A friend of mine who is politically astute shared an idea with me the other day that was a real laugher. We share an interest in politics and NASCAR. He said that our congressmen and congresswomen should have to wear a jumpsuit just like the NASCAR drivers with all of their sponsors applied in conspicuous places. That way we could tell immediately who was paying the money to influence that representative’s behavior. At first I considered it a ridiculous idea but after consideration it did not seem like it was too far fetched.

For instance, Michael Waltrip absolutely will not go on camera without mentioning NAPA Auto Parts. Jeff Gordon’s car and jumpsuit has a prominent DuPont logo and he is drinking a Pepsi every time you see him. With Dale, Jr. it is that big red BUD. NASCAR drivers are shameless about promoting their sponsors and that is OK. At least, they are up front with who provides the money and don't mind being seen hawking their products.

Our Representatives and Senators could take a lesson from this. Admittedly the decorum of those chambers may suffer but it could be worth it. For instance, Joe Biden, the Senator from Delaware, could share Bobby LaBonte’s green suit being that they share the same sponsor, MBNA, a huge credit card operation. You may recall that legislation is pending on a bill that would favor those lenders. He could share the rainbow logo that is Jeff Gordon’s since DuPont, one of the chief employers in his state, is one of his sponsors also. Tom DeLay, the majority leader, could share a color scheme with Mark Martin who drives the VIAGRA Ford since they share Pfizer, the pharmaceutical giant. MBNA is also one of his sponsors but the color scheme may not work. Maybe the aeronautics industry could combine to form a sponsorship since both Boeing and Lockheed Martin sponsor him. Of course, you can see that the majority leader may be of use to companies who bid on giant Federal contracts. Kit Bond, the Senator from Missouri, could share the company color scheme and logo with Dale, Jr. since Anheuser-Busch is their chief sponsor. My Congressman, Hal Rogers, chairs the Transportation Subcommittee on Appropriations. He and Jason Lefler could share logos and color schemes since FedEx, the package delivery concern, sponsors them both. Perhaps he could have epaulets or something since the transportation PAC is the largest contributor of its type to his coffers. Apparently the types of sponsors that Democrats have do not see the need to advertise on NASCAR. I have to say they are missing a great opportunity to get the voting bloc of the NASCAR dads to pick up on Goldman-Sachs and some heavy-duty lawyering firms or maybe they just feel that is not their market.

Anyway, you can see the possibilities. One look at your congressman could tell you whether or not he is carrying the water for some corporate entity you do not share his feelings for. In addition, it would drastically improve the color in the otherwise drab chambers of the House and Senate. This need not be limited to the upper echelons of government any more than sponsorships are limited to the Cup division of NASCAR.
Any local racer can carry a sponsorship such as the local steak house or a garage somewhere. A local politician could wear the logo or advertisement for a building contractor or road builder.

For some reason it seems that politicians are not as willing to advertise who is providing the money to sponsor them. However, I think this could be useful since the Kentucky legislature has driven a spike through the heart of the legislation that was designed to get the money out of our state elections. Since they don’t think the public would be served by not having big money finance the campaigns (they called it welfare for politicians) perhaps they would not mind making it a bit easier for the electorate to see who is providing the big money for the campaigns.

Yes, it is a simple thing to go to opensecrets.org and find out who is sponsoring your legislator but you’ve got to admit that wearing a jumpsuit with the corporate logos would make the job a lot easier. I don’t think we would have to worry about any one party having more sponsors than the other since the money seems to be spread just about everywhere. I know this seems a bit bizarre but try it on for size and see how you feel about it tomorrow.


The Blogfrog is freelance writer Bob Moore--you can contact him at mrrfmoore@alltel

Famous quote applied to Katrina

...the true measure of our society and our civilisation is not how rich, powerful or technologically advanced we are. Simply, it is how we treat the weakest and most vulnerable among us."
Darrell Whitchurch
Thursday, June 09, 2005

If you saw my letter to the “Mountain Distress” Thursday you probably know I was really pissed off at the United States Supreme Court when I wrote it. I still am. But I am pleased to announce that I have had a number of phone calls in support of medical use of marijuana. What bothers me is most of these same people don’t understand the political connection on this issue. Puritan Republicans + the Supreme Court = total control of damn near everything. Too many don't see the States Rights issue as important.

Now that I have officially outed myself as a pinko, doper criminal I thought I might as well post the letter to the world on the Internet. The only thing I would change in it is that I forgot to mention all the folks who will want to sign up for radiation and chemo just to enjoy a legal supply of grass.

Editor Mt Press

My wife and I broke the law. And I would do it again. According to Monday's Supreme Court ruling, when your body begins failing and you are wasting away due to cancer, Tough Luck! My wife was unable to tolerate any opiates, oxycontin made her violently nauseous, and we had been to three different pain clinics without success. No appetite and constant pain coupled with the knowledge that this time the Doctors are right. You only have months left to live and the Supremes say, "Suck it up - too bad, we will put you in jail if you use the drug suggested by your General Practitioner and Oncologist."

After all, if we allow seriously ill people to use this natural herb, others will fake having a terminal disease. The fact that we were following our Doctor's suggestion (they dare not actually prescribe it) in our own home and were not operating a motor vehicle or in any way affecting anyone else is immaterial to the Court. These guys claim to believe in States Rights and they do, so long as they get to dictate 100% of the "rights" for all of the States. Ten States have studied this issue in depth. Ten States have put the question to the voters. Ten States were truly being compassionate to those in pain.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank the fine solid citizens who quietly dropped off small ziplock bags of hope at our home when we needed them. Patricia never smoked anything in her life. I found that by cooking it into sauces and using it as a garnish, it did make a big difference in her final weeks and days at home. Have you ever tried to push calories on someone who has no interest in eating anything? Watching a loved one melt away? Thanks to our friends who were there when we needed them. And, yes, I would do it again.

FILIBUSTERS
50% of the U.S. Senate does not equal 50% of America

Soon, the battle will start over the next Supreme Court appointment. Suppose President Bush nominates someone like Judge Joseph Dredd.

Supreme Court nominees are confirmed in the Senate, where every state has two senators, thus two votes. Say the two senators from Wyoming (with smallest population) vote first in favor of Dredd. Keep adding states by population until the tally equals a majority of the American people.

Question: How many votes will it take to represent over 50 percent of the American people?: (a) 51, (b) 60, (c) 70, (d) 80?

Answer: They're all too low. You may need 83 senators before hitting 50 percent of the U.S. population. Over half our people live in just nine states - California, Texas, New York, Florida, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, and Georgia.

Today, it takes 60 votes for cloture to stop a filibuster. The Republican majority under Sen. Bill Frist hopes to change the rules so a simple majority of 51 senators can stop filibusters and get their way on questionable judges.

If Frist's plan succeeds, Judge Dredd could be appointed to the Supreme Court - for life - by a group of 51 senators who represent only about 17 percent of the U.S. population.

That's unprecedented, radical and dangerous.

JIM ANDERSON President, Sevier County Democratic Club
Gatlinburg

Published in the Knoxville News-Sentinel
A Proposed Progressive Position on Gun Control

By Josh Oakley
THE LIBERAL MEDIA . . . NOT

Mainstream Media Too "Liberal"?